Fulcimen
Launch markets. Share the upside.

Two inputs.
One living market.

Pair your token with something real and share what the market makes. The revenue splits in whole cents, the payouts add back up to the pot exactly, and nothing is ever paid to a bonding curve.

Weigh a split →Why the curve is dropped
01The pair
Every market starts with a pair
Yours
$FULC
the token you launch
×
Backing
reading the universe…

The backing list is read live. If it cannot be read, this card says so rather than showing a number.

02The split

Put a number on it.

Rewards
$500.00
Liquidity
$500.00
Sum
$1,000.00
HolderHoldsPaid
A2$333.33
B1$166.67
sum$500.00

Rewards plus liquidity is exactly the revenue, and the payouts add back up to the pot exactly — $500.00 of $500.00. This runs the same module the server does, not a model of it.

03Exact proportionality is impossible

A 2:1 holding of $1,000.00 is 666.666… and 333.333…. The ratio cannot be held exactly and neither can the total, so one of them has to give.

Fulcimen always keeps the total. Every cent that enters is paid out, and the odd cent goes to whoever was rounded down hardest. A payout that loses a cent to rounding is a payout nobody can audit.

revenue        $2,500.00   hybrid

  rewards      $1,250.00
  liquidity    $1,250.00
               ────────────
  sum          $2,500.00   = revenue

pot $1,250.00 at 2:1

  A            $833.33
  B            $416.67
               ────────────
  sum          $1,250.00   = pot
04The thing nobody drops

A bonding curve is not a burn address.

A pump.fun token keeps most of its supply in a bonding curve, and that curve appears in the holder list like anybody else.

Pay a holder split naively and the biggest cheque goes to the market's own pool. The total looks enormous and correct. Every real holder is quietly diluted.

So nothing is classified by name or size. The chain is asked who owns each account, and only System Program accounts are wallets. Curves, vaults, whatever is invented next year — dropped.

Kept
wallets
owned by the System Program
Dropped
programs
curves, AMM vaults, escrows
If the RPC fails
still paid
and the result says it is unverified

⚠ A lookup failure pays. Refusing somebody because our endpoint had a bad minute is worse than the thing being guarded against, and it fails in the direction that hurts the people who did nothing wrong.

05Why the list is short
12
stock
5
memecoin
2
stable
1
commodity

Eight things we can name and defend, not eighty we cannot.

Every mint in the list was checked against the chain before it was written down — not looked up in a search endpoint. Asking Jupiter's search for “WIF” hands back a copy carrying the same symbol, and asking for the gold token hands back another. A list assembled from search results is a list of whatever was minted most recently with the right three letters.

06Nothing to take on faith
Rewards plus liquidity equals the revenue, exactly.
The payouts add back up to the pot, exactly.
Every backing mint was verified on-chain before it was listed.
Program-owned accounts are dropped before a cent is divided.
A price we could not read shows an em dash, never a zero.
A lookup failure pays the holder and says the result is unverified.
$0.00
A known zero. We read it, and it is nothing.
We could not read it. Printing that as a zero would be inventing a fact.
Backing
reading prices…
live